|
Post by rexxefa on May 5, 2017 9:53:56 GMT -5
So! What strategy do you have for this game? Do you think it's better to work with large groups or not?
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 10:02:35 GMT -5
Post by lukachkinas on May 5, 2017 10:02:35 GMT -5
It is absolutely definitely NOT worth of a try to form a huge group. We would just draw huge white and red targets on our backs. A little, loyal group with a small strategy is enough to get some points and, and this is very important, survive the first round.
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 10:11:22 GMT -5
Post by rexxefa on May 5, 2017 10:11:22 GMT -5
So in your opinion how many people is the ideal number for a group in this game?
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 10:22:45 GMT -5
Post by lukachkinas on May 5, 2017 10:22:45 GMT -5
I would think 4 or 5.
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 11:08:34 GMT -5
Post by rexxefa on May 5, 2017 11:08:34 GMT -5
Hey I was thinking, have you connect with anyone? Because I just thought of a strategy with 5 people which gives 3 points minimum which involves the convict card if any of us get one. I was thinking you, me, ethy, and 2 other people you might have in mind. I'm trying to talk to Joshua and Joseph but Mas haven't give me the rooms yet.
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 11:14:27 GMT -5
Post by lukachkinas on May 5, 2017 11:14:27 GMT -5
I should probably give a heads up why we probably shouldn't do that right now, if you don't mind, no offence. 1) If there is a convict in a team, it's no way impossible to get rid of it, but that's tough. I got it in the start last time (we started S2 from this game as well), and even if I got everyone in my alliance a garnet, I ended up in Death Match. If someone close to us will confess of having a convict, we most definitely will try to help, but it really depends. 2) Secondly, and most importantly, we should craft alliances around cards, not around people. We might have an absolute trusted 5, and then everyone will have a commoner. I think we should wait until the cards are revealed to gather information and then think about the alliance.
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 11:19:16 GMT -5
Post by rexxefa on May 5, 2017 11:19:16 GMT -5
Ah okay then. I guess we'll just have to see about the cards then. And yea, I guess I might be a little aggressive with this thing .
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 12:10:07 GMT -5
Post by lukachkinas on May 5, 2017 12:10:07 GMT -5
Oh, so we will get to know the cards in 8 hours. Oh. Well, it's 4 in the morning for me, so I will only be able to join in later in the day, but if you would like me to know your card, feel free to get in touch anytime and I'll respond as soon, as my eyes will be wide enough to recognize letters. Also, a heads up - absolutely do not worry to tell me if you have a convict. We'll work it out. Cheers.
|
|
|
Game #1
May 5, 2017 21:08:44 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by rexxefa on May 5, 2017 21:08:44 GMT -5
Hi so I have a commoner. And I know that josh and ethy have noble. So do you agree grouping up with us three plus trevor? We'll at least get 2 points and "hopefully" safe from the convict card
EDIT: Trevor also had noble. So at least we have a noble and a commoner, and we can use those two cards to at least gain some safe points. And I have found a sure way to keep us out of the convict card.
|
|
|
Post by lukachkinas on May 6, 2017 1:59:08 GMT -5
I'm commoner. So now I've got information of 6 people and 2 more are approaching me to work together. Oh, it's tougher than it looked before.
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on May 6, 2017 2:24:13 GMT -5
yea, there are a few other people who are asking to work with me too... So are you in with us? Or do you have anyone else in mind and already work with them? It's okay if you're not interested, we need a respond tho so we could do our thing
|
|
|
Post by lukachkinas on May 6, 2017 2:26:00 GMT -5
I'm definitely more into this group, which is at least doing something, than with others.
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on May 6, 2017 2:29:33 GMT -5
okay then. I guess I'll start a room for our group then.
|
|
|
Post by lukachkinas on May 6, 2017 2:33:33 GMT -5
Wait, who are working with again?
|
|
|
Post by lukachkinas on May 6, 2017 2:33:58 GMT -5
I think it's me, you, Ethy, Joshua and Trevor.
|
|