|
Post by kelticwaters on Aug 28, 2017 2:18:18 GMT -5
I will match then.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 2:33:31 GMT -5
Ante: Trevor - 1, Rexxy - 1
Bets: Trevor - 14 (Front, Back). Rexxy - 14 (Back)
Remaining: Trevor - 0, Rexxy - 6
Since Trevor has called, I will reveal the back cards.
Trevor -9, Rexxy - 9
Since Trevor's.cards does not beat Rexxy's, Rexxy wins the chips. That also means Trevor has no chips and therefore is eliminated from the game.
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on Aug 28, 2017 2:35:34 GMT -5
Gg trevor. That was insane omg Sorry I haven't talked to you that much throughout the game though...
|
|
|
Post by kelticwaters on Aug 28, 2017 2:50:32 GMT -5
Thanks rexxy and thanks to everyone else. You've all been great to play with. Best of luck to Ethy and Kevin. I worked a lot with both of you over this game so it will be exciting to see how you do. Thanks to Bandage Man for putting this on. It's been a real treat for me to get to try my hand at this game.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 2:53:24 GMT -5
Thanks for playing, Trevor. I will see you at the finale where you will play an important part.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 2:54:13 GMT -5
The next Main Match will be up at 10 AM EST.
|
|
|
Post by ethynol on Aug 28, 2017 5:26:23 GMT -5
Whoa was away for 3 hours and things changed so much.
Congrats to Rexxy, and sad to see you go Trevor, it's been great playing with you. See you around soon.
If next round is gonna be a garnet match, we can start the DM right away?
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 5:49:16 GMT -5
Just want to raise something highlighted to me, somebody asked me if Trevor meant to lose 5 chips if he lost while betting twice. In rereading the rules I posted, I realised it was listed as the winner will win 5 extra chips if they win but didn't say anything about losing. In saying that, for the first time we played, I did mention midway that the loser will need to pay 5 chips and adopted that rule automatically for this game. To make it fair since I didn't specify it this time, I will ask both Trevor and Rexxy if they want to do a re-do from that point forward. Meaning that Ethy will get less 5 chips from Trevor and we will play with the balance of the cards from that point being shuffled randomly.
If both Rexxy and Trevor are okay with accepting the results, then it stays. If not, we will continue from that point on.
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on Aug 28, 2017 6:02:44 GMT -5
Well the thing is I think that rule also applied when I played the last time (if the double bet is failed that person will lose 5 chips). And IIRC that's how they do it on the show too. Also, in the food chain game you did not specify a rule in the initial thread but the results are kept the same. So I think it's fair to keep it the same this time. (it's not that I didn't want to lose (well, a bit...), mostly because I just don't want to play this game again )
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on Aug 28, 2017 6:04:12 GMT -5
also sorry for bringing up that food chain thing again...
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 6:11:23 GMT -5
For the previous version, it was indicated in the middle when Joseph asked and I specifically said the loser must pay. So for that Death Match, there is definitely no question about it. Seeing that this is a Death Match and at Final 4, I just wanted to bring it up since it was brought to my attention and I just wanted to be transparent about this.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Aug 28, 2017 6:23:18 GMT -5
Thinking again about this, Trevor had the chance to ask when I implemented the rule and he didn't. So, I will take it that he was okay with that rule and thus, I will conclude this as Rexxy's win. Sorry again about that.
|
|
|
Post by rexxefa on Aug 28, 2017 6:28:16 GMT -5
But I figure if we decided to bet 1 on both sides then the person against will lose 6 chips minimum as oppose to us who only risking 2 chips minimum.And I think that's bad balancing in the risk aspect of the gameplay.
Also we both saw the match in round 7 and aware of that rule (penalty of 5 chips for failing the double bet) and aware of it for this time. Which is why I assume Trevor isn't quick to protest that right after he got the 5 chips penalty. But that's my assumptions we still need to hear what Trevor has to say.
nvm lel
|
|
|
Post by kaycali86 on Aug 28, 2017 8:15:50 GMT -5
Sorry I missed out, was asleep. Good playing with you Trevor. Sorry you never manage to rearrange your equations beforehand. Well played Rexxy, what a turnaround!
|
|