|
Post by Bandage Man on May 29, 2017 0:49:57 GMT -5
Once Lukas confirmed about killing Kevin, I will end the night round. If not, you can still continue discussing.
|
|
ak
Arnold
Posts: 1,115
|
Post by ak on May 29, 2017 1:06:15 GMT -5
Ok I'll do my best, but depending on what time this next round starts, I may or may not be awake. I got a lot of driving tomorrow, so I want to get a good night's sleep haha. But now that the voting rule has changed, I agree, that me not dying would be a horrible idea. I'll try to shift the suspicion onto Ethy if I can and I'll put in a vote for him so that he needs at least one more vote to be okay.
Also Mas, with this new rule change, does that mean that if one person votes for someone and no one else votes, even though it's not a majority, that person is arrested because technically all non-voters count towards the majority, which happens to be that one vote?
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on May 29, 2017 1:14:04 GMT -5
Yes, that's correct.
|
|
ak
Arnold
Posts: 1,115
|
Post by ak on May 29, 2017 1:24:49 GMT -5
Okay so if we kill Kevin there's 7 people left. And honestly if possible, we could arrest someone that'll leave 6 people. We kill one more and that'll leave 5 people and we'll have the majority in any vote. Even if we fail to kill someone, as long as we kill someone that'll leave 6 people and we'll have the majority or a tie in every vote.
So with Mas's rule, if it's nearing the end of the time period of the round, we should just all band together and vote for somebody because if 3 people can make the majority, we can kill whoever and then we basically win as long as we stay active.
Assuming the day phase is 10 hours, I should be awake near the end of it (should if I can get myself to wake up) and then if we do this plan, we should all be active near the end. If we can get the majority, it doesn't matter if we talk about murderer stuff in the Main Match because they can't stop us if they don't react quickly enough.
If the opportunity doesn't arrive, we just hope for the best. Honestly, all we need to do is get the number of people down to 6 and all be alive and we win. So if we can force a tie, even if it means exposing ourselves, I think it's worth it.
What do you guys think of this plan?
|
|
|
Post by Joseph on May 29, 2017 1:25:12 GMT -5
Omg wow. So if someone gets a vote against them at the last minute before the deadline and no one else votes that is gonna suck for whoever team they're on. Insta-death rip.
|
|
|
Post by Joseph on May 29, 2017 1:26:29 GMT -5
I whole-heartedly agree Arnold! As long as we vote as close as possible to the deadline without any time for the villager team to react we can get the majority asap.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on May 29, 2017 1:28:23 GMT -5
Hold on. Let me think of the fairest way for everyone. You guys just plan first. I will definitely confirm before the deadline is up.
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on May 29, 2017 1:33:00 GMT -5
Ok thinking again, i think the most fair is to go with actual majority votes. I think that was the actual reason when I posted that. If not, it will not benefit the villagers. Sorry again about the confusion.
|
|
|
Post by Joseph on May 29, 2017 1:49:15 GMT -5
mas, to clarify:
with a population of 8, a majority of 5 votes against a person must be declared to send someone to jail?
all non votes will be not factored into the vote count? so if the other players were inactive, then in an outcome vote of 4-0 no jailing action will take place?
|
|
ak
Arnold
Posts: 1,115
|
Post by ak on May 29, 2017 1:56:29 GMT -5
Also planning ahead, I think our best option is to do nothing and bandwagon once a majority is reached. Since if we manage to kill Kevin, that'll leave 7 people which means 4 is a majority. This means that Ethy has to rally everyone against me, which means everyone has to be active enough to vote. Honestly, this might not happen, which means that if the above is true, I will be safe. As long as I deny, there's a chance they might not vote for me. Darn it, I really liked my original plan haha
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on May 29, 2017 2:14:01 GMT -5
mas, to clarify: with a population of 8, a majority of 5 votes against a person must be declared to send someone to jail? all non votes will be not factored into the vote count? so if the other players were inactive, then in an outcome vote of 4-0 no jailing action will take place? yes, that is correct. if 4-0, no jailing will happen if out of 8 people. so if someone dies this round, you need 4 votes out of 7 to send someone to jail.
|
|
|
Post by lukachkinas on May 29, 2017 2:48:03 GMT -5
I'm voting to kill Kevin. Then Arnold denies everything, me and Joseph don't vote in the trial at all and then we kill Ethy and we'll see how that pans out.
|
|
ak
Arnold
Posts: 1,115
|
Post by ak on May 29, 2017 3:00:35 GMT -5
Alright, I'm really tired, so there is a small chance that I might fall asleep before Ethy gets on and says that I'm a murderer, which in that case we just hope for the best.
|
|
|
Post by Joseph on May 29, 2017 20:46:07 GMT -5
Okay so now that Arnold is out, there are 4 villagers and us 2 left.
The question is now do we kill Ethy or someone else.
If Ethy is killed it'll be us 2 and 3 villagers with no one else to lead town, but if Ethy is saved because of the doctor then things will look grim for us with 4 villagers left.
If we kill someone else, its more of a guaranteed kill since I don't think the doctor (if still alive) would heal someone else besides Ethy. We can maintain a 3 villagers/2 murderer ratio and hope that Ethy didn't find either of us.
Either we kill Ethy for long-term gain, or someone else to maintain a 1 person majority gap.
Thoughts Lukas? I should also mention that I am horrible at defending myself as a murderer and would ppb cave if the spotlight is put on me.
|
|
|
Post by Joseph on May 30, 2017 1:52:03 GMT -5
Just in case Lukas doesn't come online:
mas, I vote to kill Ethy.
Lukas I'll be online from now until the deadline to discuss if you are able to login. Currently 75 mins until deadline.
|
|